
Just to add to the "Story". The Swedish A class in question was loaded with 5 passengers and 150Kgs of ballast. The result was one broken arm and lacerations for one of the occupants (for a 60kph rollover), broken windscreen, upper A pillar damage plus panel scratches and dents. It also interesting to note that the car was fitted with the winter spec narrow tyres (to simulate moose on road time). Closer inspection of the car indicated that the turning in front tyre rim dug into the road causing the instability. When repeated on the then normal spec tyres no one could get it to rollover but the public damage was done. I also believe that all the small high driving position cars (mainly Japanese) at that time failed as well. It is for the reason of little rollover damage that occurred and the subsequent safety modifications that I bought the A class. It fitted MB's claim of big car safety in a small one. OK after suffering the long list of you all knows what problems, I still feel that the original concept was a good one but badly executed. I fear that MB might have tried to save the cost of the safety modifications in the manufacture, which probably at the time was understandable! Have fun, Jim PS I am not or never have been employed by MB or its associates only the owner of a u beaut car. The Very End. 


